Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sani-Cola

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:54, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sani-Cola[edit]

Delete - non-notable fictional beverage that made one appearance in a long-running series. Otto4711 00:58, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable cruft. Flakeloaf 01:19, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No attempt to comply with our WP:N or WP:V policies. No assertion of notability. No sources. --Shirahadasha 02:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no notability established outside comic book, so fails WP:FICT. --Dhartung | Talk 04:26, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn fictional beverage. Lankiveil 04:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Delete - non notable, and purely fictional beverage. --Commodorepants 04:59, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A subject of one episode of Tintin. Merge into an episode guide if anything. --Dennisthe2 05:05, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for all the reasons previously stated. House of Scandal 08:56, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and delete This should be merged in to the tintin article and then the article just on the drink its self deleted. Tellyaddict 12:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as tricia -- Whpq 15:11, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Delete as non-notable in its own right but still somewhat relevant in context of the series. --tennis man ^{sign here!} 16:08, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's all been said. If this is notable enough within the context of Tintin, then merge it, but definitely don't maintain a separate article.zadignose 17:25, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NN . —dima/s-ko/ 20:05, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom as non-notable fictional beverage. Big top 20:24, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.